From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jonas Fonseca Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rev-list(1): group options; reformat; document more options Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20060831230811.GE482@diku.dk> References: <20060831223715.GC482@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 01 01:08:32 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GIvdz-0004XF-Mi for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:08:20 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750751AbWHaXIQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:08:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932107AbWHaXIQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:08:16 -0400 Received: from [130.225.96.91] ([130.225.96.91]:60620 "EHLO mgw1.diku.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750751AbWHaXIP (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Aug 2006 19:08:15 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mgw1.diku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C4777004C; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mgw1.diku.dk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mgw1.diku.dk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08762-12; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nhugin.diku.dk (nhugin.diku.dk [130.225.96.140]) by mgw1.diku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 766D5770007; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ask.diku.dk (ask.diku.dk [130.225.96.225]) by nhugin.diku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A864C6DF88D; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:06:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by ask.diku.dk (Postfix, from userid 3873) id 5DE3E62A06; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:08:11 +0200 (CEST) To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at diku.dk Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote Thu, Aug 31, 2006: > > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jonas Fonseca wrote: > > > > An attempted facelift to the neglected git-rev-list manpage. One > > question if I may, the diff-related -r and -t options, how are they > > supposed to work? > > Umm? You should get a "usage" error, no? Yes, ok, they do not seem to make sense for git-rev-list, however if you pass either to git-log, the output seems to make room for a diff, adding one extra newline, but without appending any diff. -- Jonas Fonseca