From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere.
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:54:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060902175408.GD27826@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vodty1swz.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> wrote:
> Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> writes:
>
> > I think the better thing to do here is to not repack objects which
> > are already contained in very large packs. Just leave them be.
>
> I've been thinking about updating rev-list so that repack
> can be used to organize packs into zero or more "archive packs"
> and one "active pack".
>
> repack without -a essentially boils down to:
>
> rev-list --objects --all --unpacked |
> pack-objects $new_pack
>
> which picks up all live loose objects and create a new pack.
>
> If rev-list had an extention that lets you say
>
> rev-list --objects --all --unpacked=$active_pack |
> pack-objects $new_pack
Hmm. Seems very reasonable actually. :-)
How do we pick the "active pack" in git-repack.sh?
How about "--include-pack=$active_pack" instead of
"--unpacked=$active_pack"? The latter just reads really funny to me.
--
Shawn.
--
VGER BF report: S 0.9993
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-03 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9e4733910608290943g6aa79855q62b98caf4f19510@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829165811.GB21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291037k2d9fb791v18abc19bdddf5e89@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829175819.GE21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291155g782953bbv5df1b74878f4fcf1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829190548.GK21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291252q130fc723r945e6ab906ca6969@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829232007.GC22935@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291807q9b896e4sdbfaa9e49de58c2b@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-30 1:51 ` Mozilla .git tree Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 2:25 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 2:58 ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30 3:10 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 3:27 ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30 5:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-08-30 11:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01 7:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 1:19 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 4:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 4:39 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 14:20 ` Jon Smirl
2006-09-02 17:39 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:44 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 2:04 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:51 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 3:54 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-01 17:45 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-09-01 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-01 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01 23:14 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 1:39 ` VGER BF report? Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-02 5:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-09-02 1:52 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 3:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 4:52 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 9:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 10:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:54 ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2006-09-03 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 4:10 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 6:44 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04 7:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 0:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-05 8:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 4:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060902175408.GD27826@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).