git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean?
       [not found] <200609050108.57695.jnareb@gmail.com>
@ 2006-09-04 23:16 ` Fernando J. Pereda
  2006-09-04 23:26   ` Jakub Narebski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fernando J. Pereda @ 2006-09-04 23:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Narebski; +Cc: git

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1023 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:08:57AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> To add autoconf support for checking if NO_ICONV has to be defined
> (Define NO_ICONV if your libc does not properly support iconv.)
> one needs to know what does "properly support iconv" mean.
> 
> The commit message of a commit which introduced this compilation 
> variable (commit b6e56eca8a4eb74a86e9f2d99aa480c665458aa7) tells:
> 
>     Systems using some uClibc versions do not properly support
>     iconv stuff.
> 
> At what exactly iconv fail? What should the test to put in configure.ac 
> check?

As far as I know, iconv stuff is not supported on uClibc. Thats the
reason I sent the patch. Gentoo bug #115826 [1].

You should probably set it if you are building for uClibc. Not sure how
you'd test that in configure.ac though.

- ferdy

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115826

-- 
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean?
  2006-09-04 23:16 ` What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean? Fernando J. Pereda
@ 2006-09-04 23:26   ` Jakub Narebski
  2006-09-04 23:31     ` Junio C Hamano
  2006-09-04 23:41     ` Fernando J. Pereda
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Narebski @ 2006-09-04 23:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Fernando J. Pereda, git

On Tue, Sep 05 2006 at 01:16, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:08:57AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> To add autoconf support for checking if NO_ICONV has to be defined
>> (Define NO_ICONV if your libc does not properly support iconv.)
>> one needs to know what does "properly support iconv" mean.
>> 
>> The commit message of a commit which introduced this compilation 
>> variable (commit b6e56eca8a4eb74a86e9f2d99aa480c665458aa7) tells:
>> 
>>     Systems using some uClibc versions do not properly support
>>     iconv stuff.
>> 
>> At what exactly iconv fail? What should the test to put in
>> configure.ac check?
> 
> As far as I know, iconv stuff is not supported on uClibc. Thats the
> reason I sent the patch. Gentoo bug #115826 [1].
> 
> You should probably set it if you are building for uClibc. Not sure
> how you'd test that in configure.ac though.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115826

Gaah, I have some problems accessing the Gentoo bug database.
Is the problem that iconv does not exist in libc, or it exist but 
misbehaves?
-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean?
  2006-09-04 23:26   ` Jakub Narebski
@ 2006-09-04 23:31     ` Junio C Hamano
  2006-09-04 23:41     ` Fernando J. Pereda
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2006-09-04 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Narebski; +Cc: git

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Gaah, I have some problems accessing the Gentoo bug database.
> Is the problem that iconv does not exist in libc, or it exist but 
> misbehaves?

In small configurations that do not care about i18n, it is often
done to give iconv routines that is noop/ident in order to make
the programs compile and run.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean?
  2006-09-04 23:26   ` Jakub Narebski
  2006-09-04 23:31     ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2006-09-04 23:41     ` Fernando J. Pereda
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Fernando J. Pereda @ 2006-09-04 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Narebski; +Cc: git

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1611 bytes --]

On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:26:56AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05 2006 at 01:16, Fernando J. Pereda wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:08:57AM +0200, Jakub Narebski wrote:
> >> To add autoconf support for checking if NO_ICONV has to be defined
> >> (Define NO_ICONV if your libc does not properly support iconv.)
> >> one needs to know what does "properly support iconv" mean.
> >> 
> >> The commit message of a commit which introduced this compilation 
> >> variable (commit b6e56eca8a4eb74a86e9f2d99aa480c665458aa7) tells:
> >> 
> >>     Systems using some uClibc versions do not properly support
> >>     iconv stuff.
> >> 
> >> At what exactly iconv fail? What should the test to put in
> >> configure.ac check?
> > 
> > As far as I know, iconv stuff is not supported on uClibc. Thats the
> > reason I sent the patch. Gentoo bug #115826 [1].
> > 
> > You should probably set it if you are building for uClibc. Not sure
> > how you'd test that in configure.ac though.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115826
> 
> Gaah, I have some problems accessing the Gentoo bug database.
> Is the problem that iconv does not exist in libc, or it exist but 
> misbehaves?

Quoting Mike Frysinger:

iconv is part of uClibc itself but is disabled by default since it isnt
quite stable yet ... so yes, trying to use the iconv package wont work

That was on 2005-12-17 so I don't know what's the status now.

- ferdy

-- 
Fernando J. Pereda Garcimartín
Gentoo Developer (Alpha,net-mail,mutt,git)
20BB BDC3 761A 4781 E6ED  ED0B 0A48 5B0C 60BD 28D4

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 191 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-09-04 23:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <200609050108.57695.jnareb@gmail.com>
2006-09-04 23:16 ` What does "properly support iconv" in git Makefile (NO_ICONV) mean? Fernando J. Pereda
2006-09-04 23:26   ` Jakub Narebski
2006-09-04 23:31     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 23:41     ` Fernando J. Pereda

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).