From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@horizon.com Subject: Re: A look at some alternative PACK file encodings Date: 7 Sep 2006 05:07:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20060907090756.30111.qmail@science.horizon.com> Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, linux@horizon.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 07 11:08:02 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GLFrd-0007wy-4A for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Sep 2006 11:08:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751322AbWIGJH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 05:07:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751326AbWIGJH6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 05:07:58 -0400 Received: from science.horizon.com ([192.35.100.1]:64556 "HELO science.horizon.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751322AbWIGJH5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2006 05:07:57 -0400 Received: (qmail 30112 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Sep 2006 05:07:56 -0400 To: gitzilla@gmail.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Support for 'thin' packs would pretty much require mixing IDs and > (relative) offsets in the same pack file. An alternative would be to create a small "placeholder" object that just gives an ID, then refer to it by offset. That would avoid the need for an id/offset bit with every offset, and possibly save more space if the same object was referenced multiple times. And it just seems simpler.