From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] gitweb: Make the Git logo link target to point to the homepage Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:46:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20060923194643.GN13132@pasky.or.cz> References: <20060919212725.GA13132@pasky.or.cz> <20060923125746.GJ8259@pasky.or.cz> <7virjes7dq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Sep 23 21:47:09 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRDSm-0002vT-5S for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:47:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751508AbWIWTqq (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:46:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751509AbWIWTqq (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:46:46 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:51671 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751508AbWIWTqp (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 15:46:45 -0400 Received: (qmail 4312 invoked by uid 2001); 23 Sep 2006 21:46:43 +0200 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7virjes7dq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dear diary, on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 09:36:01PM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano said that... > Petr Baudis writes: > > > Dear diary, on Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:27:25PM CEST, I got a letter > > where Petr Baudis said that... > >> It provides more useful information for causual Git users than the Git docs > >> (especially about where to get Git and such). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis > > > > Ping? This is the only gitweb patch still in my stg stack. I guess > > noone really cares strongly either way since there were no comments. > > I did not care either way, but I did not like either of these > hardcoded strings in the code, and felt that if we are touching > that part of the code we also should be making real improvement > at the same time ;-). > > Doing something like this would let us update it easier, and > let people override with GITWEB_CONFIG if they want to. Reasonable. Acked-by: Petr Baudis -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i