From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Pearce Subject: Re: fsck objects and timestamp ordering Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:48:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20060925164855.GC27043@spearce.org> References: <9e4733910609250932r146fea7alaaf858a18a8b50b0@mail.gmail.com> <20060925164004.GB27043@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 25 18:49:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRtdn-0007Rt-BX for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:49:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751238AbWIYQtD (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:49:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751255AbWIYQtD (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:49:03 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:3491 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751252AbWIYQtA (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:49:00 -0400 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GRtdT-0004al-9c; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:48:51 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDCBF20FB28; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 12:48:55 -0400 (EDT) To: Jon Smirl Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060925164004.GB27043@spearce.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn Pearce wrote: > Jon Smirl wrote: > > I am having trouble with a CVS repository where the timestamp ordering > > and dependency order are in conflict. It would be best if git didn't > > experience the same problem. > > It would be best if Git didn't experience a lot of the weird stuff > people were able to do to their CVS repositories. Fortunately the > friendly folks on this mailing list have put the better part of a > year and a half into doing just that. :) Wow, on reread that last sentance seems to imply that the fine people who have contributed to Git have spent the past year and a half making sure Git has plenty of weird stuff contained within it. Which is not what I meant at all. :) My brain's just not working today (some sort of head cold thing going on). Its probably best that I stay away from anything that requires any sort of logic... such as English. -- Shawn.