From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew L Foster Subject: git and time Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:23:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20060926232316.98065.qmail@web51009.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: mfoster167@yahoo.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 27 01:23:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSMGo-0001ND-1w for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:23:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932102AbWIZXXS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:23:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932489AbWIZXXS (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:23:18 -0400 Received: from web51009.mail.yahoo.com ([206.190.39.128]:61061 "HELO web51009.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932102AbWIZXXR (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:23:17 -0400 Received: (qmail 98067 invoked by uid 60001); 26 Sep 2006 23:23:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=FeCAmESa5vFAKOMbMvrqPDWK7wpUM8VlLU2ApMS8J7AZC+JYHfCtMjnLOan05HTtFQMc6skUkTsSKRRyOpkNcBhdQwuBtPrbwSefmFjznImF8MZhTPnnboawPoyKFfJHmLpeYi/odg1YxLG8Z6jCBUnxnFwkZa8qSKaZ/4xSElg= ; Received: from [207.172.80.85] by web51009.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:23:16 PDT To: git@vger.kernel.org Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: After seeing how git currently accepts a remote repository's timestamp it occurred to me that git should probably instead prefer the time a particular changeset was committed to _this_ repository. Perhaps I don't know enough about git but it seems to me the important information is when a particular changeset was committed to this repository, all other remote/sub/parent repositories' timestamps are secondary (or at least should be tracked separately). -Matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com