From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Pearce Subject: Re: git and time Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:02:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20060927230256.GD21839@spearce.org> References: <20060927222854.82278.qmail@web51014.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew L Foster , Andreas Ericsson , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Jeff King , Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 28 01:03:14 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GSiQp-0007Z4-P4 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:03:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1031204AbWI0XDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:03:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1031205AbWI0XDI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:03:08 -0400 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:52674 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1031204AbWI0XDG (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:03:06 -0400 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1GSiQT-0006m6-Co; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:02:49 -0400 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C47520FB28; Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:02:56 -0400 (EDT) To: Linus Torvalds Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Matthew L Foster wrote: > > > > So the separate action of replication is not tracked? > > Correct. Replication without changes is a no-op. I think it could be reasonably argued that knowing when the head(s) of your public repository on a mirror of kernel.org changed to a given value is useful. Especially when there is a mirroring lag. -- Shawn.