From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: tree view: eliminate redundant "blob" Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 22:03:44 +0200 Message-ID: <200610022203.44733.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <20061002191115.84730.qmail@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Oct 02 22:04:42 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUU0i-0001Y9-Ck for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 22:03:32 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964941AbWJBUD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:03:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964939AbWJBUD3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:03:29 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:41420 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964941AbWJBUD2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2006 16:03:28 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o38so550829ugd for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=j+jqIAlFQuguebb5VpWJnNrhBgh1vLvyLg2fvGCJhRhhMz9JTH5eRNi9HBqVIYDNPIkNg/aVOC0KnAFYnygPcD6qHUjRMRTQ4jgqdEFauAOTH2Thn9mUpnnFyhgJ/32yXM/1HdrJOpBb3k+/l4UORfU1yUgy3VLSIBRhtUnyPI0= Received: by 10.67.21.11 with SMTP id y11mr2972842ugi; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-81-190-17-45.torun.mm.pl ( [81.190.17.45]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id y1sm2762173uge.2006.10.02.13.03.26; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 13:03:26 -0700 (PDT) To: Luben Tuikov User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20061002191115.84730.qmail@web31811.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Luben Tuikov wrote: > --- Jakub Narebski wrote: >> I think that redundancy in a visual interface (and not only visual, as >> seen in the example of Perl programming language) is a good idea, >> contrary to the redundancy in code or data (database). > > Jakub, > > Your opinion here is highly subjective. Yours too. > Years of experience make certain things "make sense" and other > "make less sense". Note that that is in itself subjective. > > Give it 10 years, your opinion will change. Perhaps. Perhaps not. I guess we have to agree to disagree. It's Junio opinion that matters (which patches would get accepted). I'd like to mention that there are if I remember correctly some other places, like "commit" view which have this hated by you redundancy. -- Jakub Narebski Poland