From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Pazu <pazu@pazu.com.br>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: core-git and porcelains
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 11:08:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061011150842.GA31298@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <egivn8$5mf$1@sea.gmane.org>
Pazu <pazu@pazu.com.br> wrote:
> I'm a newcomer to git, and for the last few days, I've been struggling
> to learn how to better use git in my day to day. One particular thing
> that has been puzzling me is how much git is self-sufficient, and how
> much I should depend on porcelains.
>
> Apparently, I'm not alone in this:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/6194/focus=6194
>
> The above post was made about three months ago; where things stand now?
> Do you feel that git-core should suffice for most developers, or should
> I really look into something like Cogito?
>
> Depending on the project, my git usage would fit one of two profiles. I
> run some standalone projects, where I'm the sole developer. I was
> looking into using cogito for this scenario, but one thing that baffled
> me is how git-core and cogito use different branch representations.
>
> For the larger part of my day, however, I'm looking into using git as a
> personal tool in a very large corporate project; This project is
> currently controlled using subversion, and my idea is to use git as a
> 'staging' system, where I work (possibly offline) before pushing changes
> to the upstream (remote, slow as hell) subversion repository. Here,
> git-svn seems to be my best friend.
>
> Any advice to this poor newbie?
I would just stick with core Git. I haven't used Cogito in almost
a year so I can't say what I'm missing there, but core Git works
very well for all of my needs. I use it in a lot of different
projects, some which require git-svn, others which require some
bastard git-svn-workalike for non-SVN systems, and others which
are just Git projects and don't have to cooperate with others.
Git has come a long way in terms of user interface. It still has a
few rough edges but I think that there are less rough edges on core
Git's command line user interface than there are on the Subversion
command line client or the CVS command line client.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-10-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-10-11 14:39 core-git and porcelains Pazu
2006-10-11 15:08 ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2006-10-11 16:45 ` Pazu
2006-10-11 16:54 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-10-11 17:13 ` Pazu
2006-10-11 17:01 ` Seth Falcon
2006-10-11 18:08 ` Robin Rosenberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061011150842.GA31298@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pazu@pazu.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).