Re: [PATCH] git-pickaxe: blame rewritten.

[Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>]

Dear diary, on Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:55:49PM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> > Currently it does what git-blame does, but only faster.
> > 
> > More importantly, its internal structure is designed to support
> > content movement (aka cut-and-paste) more easily by allowing
> > more than one paths to be taken from the same commit.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
> > ---
> > 
> > I really hate to do this immediately after writing obituary for
> > annotate, but I had a solid 24-hour to work on git, which is a
> > rare opportunity for me these days, so here it is.
> 
> Why not reuse git-annotate name? git-pickaxe doesn't do pickaxe...

I agree that git-pickaxe is wrong, and luckily Junio does too,
apparently.

But please, let's not go right back to the git-annotate / git-blame
situation. It's just confusing to have two tools that do the same thing,
perhaps subtly differently. If it's gonna replace git-blame, it should
either do that right away or live as git-blame2 for some time, but not
play any confusing games with the names.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)