From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jakub Narebski Subject: Re: VCS comparison table Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:30:30 +0200 Message-ID: <200610212130.31414.jnareb@gmail.com> References: <45357CC3.4040507@utoronto.ca> <20061021181149.GM75501@over-yonder.net> <20061021191949.GA8096@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , bazaar-ng@lists.canonical.com, Linus Torvalds , Carl Worth , Andreas Ericsson , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Oct 21 21:30:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GbMY6-0005Kx-8k for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 21:30:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422839AbWJUTaX (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:30:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422843AbWJUTaX (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:30:23 -0400 Received: from hu-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.214.236]:32609 "EHLO hu-out-0506.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422839AbWJUTaW (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Oct 2006 15:30:22 -0400 Received: by hu-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 28so615570hub for ; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=MTKL+ddqj6OA5iTtj+bRExIhNk3rvCVGXa9zc57ydKq9aUlomEHASZealcOkOLPAVnFG5zbn2+hZwV6FTfEaotJM2bSrZHH9n8ojF4eIJ2gCKGQRwOADORwlu+n7I7XTazKg8E0hbaBv5033yzJOb+BJ+KHSKHuV+A6mLtuwXS8= Received: by 10.67.121.15 with SMTP id y15mr4274384ugm; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host-81-190-23-110.torun.mm.pl ( [81.190.23.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 50sm116599ugb.2006.10.21.12.30.19; Sat, 21 Oct 2006 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) To: Jeff King User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 In-Reply-To: <20061021191949.GA8096@coredump.intra.peff.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King wrote: > The difference, I think, is that it's easier in git to move the upstream > around: you simply start fetching from a different place. I'm not clear > on how that works in bzr (if it invalidates revnos or has other side > effects). That's good example of fully distributed approach. I can fetch directly (actually, I cannot) from Junio private repository, I can fetch from public git.git repository, either using git:// or http:// protocol, I can fetch from somebody else clone of git repository: intermixing those fetches, and revids (commit-ids) remain constant and unchanged. -- Jakub Narebski Poland