git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Make search type a popup menu
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:27:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061024112727.GZ20017@pasky.or.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ehkfis$6da$1@sea.gmane.org>

Dear diary, on Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:33:12AM CEST, I got a letter
where Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> said that...
> Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> > This makes the multiple search types actually usable by the user;
> > if you don't read the gitweb source, you don't even have an idea
> > that you can write things like that there.
> 
> This is I think good change, although I'm not sure if I like changing
> using search operators to using additional CGI parameter.
> 
> Having help page for search is _certainly_ very good change. Perhaps
> we should put it out-of-line, not embedded? Just a thought...

You mean out-of-file? I've pondered it but I think this is simpler than
having yet another external file with yet another configuration option,
and the help file is not anyway likely something you will want to
customize per-site.

> This patch changes search box into something similar to Google
> "Advanced Search". Yet Google "Advanced Search" box generates search
> query using search operators. Search operators are just more powerfull.
> I know that gitweb doesn't use this power now (it uses only one operator,
> first if I remember correctly), but we can do this in the future
> (e.g. searching for both author and specified string in commit message,
> or searching for given author OR given committer). Well, we can always
> change it back...

Well, yes, that's something we can do when we actually implement the
operators, but I think doing it this way is less powerful, but much more
*useful* since users not familiar with gitweb will have an actual idea
on how to use it, and gitweb is something that will have 90% of users
not familiar with it. So perhaps have an "extended" search type which
will accept the keywords?

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
#!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-24 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-10-24  3:15 [PATCH] gitweb: Make search type a popup menu Petr Baudis
2006-10-24  7:33 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-10-24 11:27   ` Petr Baudis [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-10-11 20:58 Petr Baudis
2006-10-11 21:15 ` Jakub Narebski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061024112727.GZ20017@pasky.or.cz \
    --to=pasky@suse.cz \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).