From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [PATCH (amend)] gitweb: Slight visual improvements to commitdiff view Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 03:47:40 +0200 Message-ID: <20061027014740.GV20017@pasky.or.cz> References: <200610270150.40100.jnareb@gmail.com> <780488.44315.qm@web31803.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <7vu01qilg1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 01:50:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org, ltuikov@yahoo.com Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vu01qilg1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GdGoy-0001rk-Mt for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2006 03:47:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946100AbWJ0Brm (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:47:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946101AbWJ0Brm (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:47:42 -0400 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:44423 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946100AbWJ0Brl (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Oct 2006 21:47:41 -0400 Received: (qmail 7914 invoked by uid 2001); 27 Oct 2006 03:47:40 +0200 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Dear diary, on Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 03:42:06AM CEST, I got a letter where Junio C Hamano said that... > Luben Tuikov writes: > > > --- Jakub Narebski wrote: > > ... > >> Those changes might wait for proper refactoring of gitweb CSS (having > >> for example 8px padding in one place only). > > > > Excellent! I'd like this explanation to be part of the > > commit message if that patchset is committed to git.git. > > I'd like that kind of explanation with the patch in a single > message when it is ready to be applied, too. > > I'll leave it up to you guys to decide if CSS refactoring should > go in first (I personally feel it probably is the case, in which > case this patch would need to be rebased I suspect). We don't have any such patch, do we? So let anyone doing that patch take this one into account and merge in whatever we have, I'd say. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ #!/bin/perl -sp0777i