From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Petr Baudis Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not ignore hidden refs Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:28:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20061118192830.GP7201@pasky.or.cz> References: <20061118041137.6064.75827.stgit@machine.or.cz> <7v8xi9fjw9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061118045323.GK7201@pasky.or.cz> <7vzmapdxki.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vzmapdxki.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-message-flag: Outlook : A program to spread viri, but it can do mail too. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GlVrk-0007tV-1O for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:28:40 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756389AbWKRT2d (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:28:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756395AbWKRT2d (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:28:33 -0500 Received: from w241.dkm.cz ([62.24.88.241]:28615 "EHLO machine.or.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756389AbWKRT2c (ORCPT ); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:28:32 -0500 Received: (qmail 23030 invoked by uid 2001); 18 Nov 2006 20:28:30 +0100 To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 08:27:09AM CET, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think, however, if we (collectively as all the Porcelain > writers although I am not really one of them) are to support it, > they should not make distinction to the core, and it should be > handled with the agreed-upon convention. I guess I agree. > Personally I established a convention to treat heads/??/* as > "private namespace" while using heads/* as public refs for my > own work (I do that for git.git as people know, and I do that > for my day job project as well). I do not think it is a great > enough convention to be promoted as the official BCP, but it has > been good enough for me, especially commands like "show-branch" > and "tag -l" understands the shell-style filegrobs (e.g > "show-branch master heads/??/*" would show what's yet to be > polished and merged). That's way too arbitrary for my taste, I think I needn't explain why. :-) What about leading underscore? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/ The meaning of Stonehenge in Traflamadorian, when viewed from above, is: "Replacement part being rushed with all possible speed."