From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:25:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20061120232507.GH12285@fieldses.org> References: <20061120215116.GA20736@admingilde.org> <7v7ixp20za.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 23:25:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Junio C Hamano , Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmIVq-0001Im-5H for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 00:25:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030434AbWKTXZN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:25:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030458AbWKTXZN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:25:13 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:57007 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030434AbWKTXZM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:25:12 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GmIVf-0006so-UW; Mon, 20 Nov 2006 18:25:07 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:05:47PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Mon, 20 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > That was shot down by Linus and I agree with him. "bind" was a > > bad idea because binding of a particular subproject commit into > > a tree is a property of the tree, not one of the commits that > > happen to have that tree. > > Yes. I think it would be a _fine_ idea to have a new tree-entry type that > points to a sub-commit, but it really does need to be on a "tree level", > not a commit level. Would it also be possible to allow the "Tree:" line in the commit object to refer to a commit, or does the root of the project need to be a special case?