From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Martin Waitz Subject: Re: [RFC] Submodules in GIT Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:21:58 +0100 Message-ID: <20061121062158.GF20736@admingilde.org> References: <20061120215116.GA20736@admingilde.org> <7v7ixp20za.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v4pstzmk5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO" NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Fingerprint: B21B 5755 9684 5489 7577 001A 8FF1 1AC5 DFE8 0FB2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GmP1M-0001kR-5J for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:22:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934338AbWKUGWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:22:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S934339AbWKUGWA (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:22:00 -0500 Received: from agent.admingilde.org ([213.95.21.5]:51146 "EHLO mail.admingilde.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934338AbWKUGV7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 01:21:59 -0500 Received: from martin by mail.admingilde.org with local (Exim 4.50 #1) id 1GmP14-0007SL-DA; Tue, 21 Nov 2006 07:21:58 +0100 To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org --oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hoi :) On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 01:42:22AM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Perhaps it would be best to join those two subproject support > solutions together: "bind" tree/commit mount header in commit > object, and "commit" entry in a tree. But which is the autoritative source then? Does it give any more information? The advantage in your proposal would be that submodules would be visible immediately when looking at the commit, without having to traverse the entire tree. This may be worthwhile when showing the combined history of parent and submodules. But still this looks like "caching submodule information in the commit object" and I do not know if we really want to do that. --=20 Martin Waitz --oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFYpsFj/Eaxd/oD7IRAot9AJ9YbToh3Ur2GGJsLukoM4IVWl2LAACePk9C unoBHZm6JZ7vidffPz6BgTI= =JtK2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----