git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:59:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611270159.14925.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvel2yi2u.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Sunday 26 November 2006 04:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > git-clone should skip rewinding branches by default, unless the user
> > adds an option (e.g. --include-rewinding-branches).  This way new
> > users to git.git don't get the `pu` branch unless they really mean
> > to get it, at which point they have hopefully also read the upstream's
> > description of the `pu` branch and its rewinding policy, and can
> > at least start to grasp what is going to happen if they start to
> > work with the branch.
> 
> I like this approach very much.

I am not so sure about this. IMHO, any user expects to see "pu" branch
cloned too after cloning git.git (at least me, and a newbie probably too).

I agree about the remote branch description saying that "pu" branch will
be rewinded. git-clone should set "+" before such a branch.

As said, the real problem begins when the user tries to branch off her
own local branch from "pu". At this point, "git branch" or
"git checkout -b ..." should warn the user that he has to expect troubles
when branching off from such a branch, and only allow it with a
"--force" option.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-11-27  0:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-25 21:53 [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use Junio C Hamano
2006-11-25 22:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-25 23:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-25 23:34     ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-26  3:37       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  5:30         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  3:14     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26  3:48       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  3:34   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26  3:58     ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  4:23       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26  5:11         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  7:39           ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26  9:13             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  9:43               ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-27  0:59       ` Josef Weidendorfer [this message]
2006-11-27  1:21         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-30 18:16       ` Jon Loeliger
2006-11-30 21:22         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26  9:32     ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-27  0:41 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-11-29 21:32 ` Jon Loeliger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200611270159.14925.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
    --to=josef.weidendorfer@gmx.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=spearce@spearce.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).