From: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:59:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200611270159.14925.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vvel2yi2u.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
On Sunday 26 November 2006 04:58, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > git-clone should skip rewinding branches by default, unless the user
> > adds an option (e.g. --include-rewinding-branches). This way new
> > users to git.git don't get the `pu` branch unless they really mean
> > to get it, at which point they have hopefully also read the upstream's
> > description of the `pu` branch and its rewinding policy, and can
> > at least start to grasp what is going to happen if they start to
> > work with the branch.
>
> I like this approach very much.
I am not so sure about this. IMHO, any user expects to see "pu" branch
cloned too after cloning git.git (at least me, and a newbie probably too).
I agree about the remote branch description saying that "pu" branch will
be rewinded. git-clone should set "+" before such a branch.
As said, the real problem begins when the user tries to branch off her
own local branch from "pu". At this point, "git branch" or
"git checkout -b ..." should warn the user that he has to expect troubles
when branching off from such a branch, and only allow it with a
"--force" option.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-27 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-25 21:53 [RFD] making separate-remote layout easier to use Junio C Hamano
2006-11-25 22:25 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-25 23:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-25 23:34 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-26 3:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 5:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 3:14 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26 3:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 3:34 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26 3:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 4:23 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26 5:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 7:39 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-11-26 9:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 9:43 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-27 0:59 ` Josef Weidendorfer [this message]
2006-11-27 1:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-30 18:16 ` Jon Loeliger
2006-11-30 21:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-11-26 9:32 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-11-27 0:41 ` Josef Weidendorfer
2006-11-29 21:32 ` Jon Loeliger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200611270159.14925.Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de \
--to=josef.weidendorfer@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).