From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 07:00:28 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061214120028.GK1747@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0943d9e0612140331q4c3a32e2l361fd04375f091d7@mail.gmail.com>
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@gmail.com> wrote:
> What it the relation between git-merge-recursive and "git-read-tree
> -m" (if any)? I currently still use "git-read-tree -m" for some merges
> because of the speed gain due to the --agressive option (really
> noticeable when picking a patch from an older branch). Probably
> git-merge-recursive cannot implement this since it needs to track
> deletion/additions for rename detection.
There is a difference; always has been, probably will be for a
long time.
read-tree -m performs some trivial merges in the index. Its manual
page explains it in gory detail, but its the really trivial, basic
three way merge rules: Given two trees X and Y and some so-called
base B:
* If X == Y == B for that file, take any of the three.
* If X == Y, but not B, take X or Y.
* If X changes a file, but Y == B for that file, take X.
* If Y changes a file, but X == B for that file, take Y.
I believe that the --agressive option has added some additional
rules about trivial file deletes. However notice the all important
rule is not handled by read-tree -m:
* If X changes a file, Y also changes file, merge them to create Z.
This is where read-tree -m punts and hands things off to
merge-recursive, which needs to invoke diff3 (or now the internal
xdl_merge). read-tree -m also currently does not handle file
additions, mode changes, or renames/copies. All of which are a
lot more expensive to compute and are slightly less common.
So Git gets decent performance by going through the rather cheap
read-tree -m, then falling back into the slower merge-recursive
when read-tree -m punted. Given that I see about 50% of my merges
succeed with just read-tree -m and the other half punt over to
merge-recursive it just about balances out over several merges.
> Are there any other things to be aware if I completely replace the
> "git-read-tree + diff3" with git-merge-recursive?
From what I understand git-merge-recursive will do everything that
git-read-tree -m will do, except its going to be slower doing the
really common, stupid cases that git-read-tree -m can handle on
its own.
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-14 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-07 10:17 [PATCH 1/1] Make sure the empty tree exists when needed in merge-recursive Shawn O. Pearce
2006-12-09 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] diff_tree_sha1(): avoid rereading trees if possible Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-10 1:47 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-10 22:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-09 23:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] merge-recursive: make empty tree a known object Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-10 18:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 21:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-10 21:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-10 22:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-10 22:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-10 23:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-09 23:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] add test case for recursive merge Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-10 0:18 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-10 3:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-10 22:51 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-12 22:49 ` [PATCH] t6024: fix timing problem Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-12 23:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-12 23:59 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-13 3:05 ` [PATCH] merge-recursive: add/add really is modify/modify with an empty base Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-13 6:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-13 11:46 ` StGit repo & gitweb, was " Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-13 11:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-13 22:09 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-12-13 23:06 ` Robin Rosenberg
2006-12-13 23:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-13 23:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-19 18:50 ` Petr Baudis
2006-12-19 19:39 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-13 22:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-12-13 22:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-13 23:48 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-14 11:31 ` Catalin Marinas
2006-12-14 11:41 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-14 12:00 ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2006-12-14 13:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-14 14:15 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061214120028.GK1747@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).