From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Fitzsimons Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gitweb: Allow search to be disabled from the config file. Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:28:41 +0000 Message-ID: <20061223122841.GD11474@localhost> References: <11668449162618-git-send-email-robfitz@273k.net> <11668449271631-git-send-email-robfitz@273k.net> <11668449274162-git-send-email-robfitz@273k.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 23 13:29:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gy5zj-00065j-3g for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:28:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753291AbWLWM2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:28:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753526AbWLWM2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:28:46 -0500 Received: from igraine.blacknight.ie ([81.17.252.25]:50867 "EHLO igraine.blacknight.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753291AbWLWM2q (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Dec 2006 07:28:46 -0500 Received: from [194.125.99.166] (helo=localhost) by igraine.blacknight.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gy5zI-0004X9-Sw; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:28:29 +0000 To: Jakub Narebski Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2, required 7, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_NERDS_IE -2.00) X-MailScanner-From: robfitz@273k.net Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I'm not sure if it is worth disabling such not demanding in resources > (contrary to pickaxe, blame and to some extent snapshot). Perhaps it would > be better to simply paginate search result, like "history" view got > paginated? Yes that makes sense. I'll withdraw this patch and try and come up with a new one which can paginate search results. Robert