From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shawn Pearce Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20061226042110.GA28084@spearce.org> References: <7vmz5bfidj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 26 05:21:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gz3oh-0007oQ-DS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 26 Dec 2006 05:21:31 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932069AbWLZEVP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932233AbWLZEVP (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:15 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:57736 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932069AbWLZEVO (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:14 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1Gz3oC-000858-Bb; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:00 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 37BAF20FB65; Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:21:11 -0500 (EST) To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vmz5bfidj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > * sp/mmap (Sun Dec 24 00:47:23 2006 -0500) 20 commits > > I wanted to have this in 'next' but it appears that this makes > git-push with a non-trivial amount of data to fail. v1.5.0 does > not have to wait for this because this should not change any UI. Really? Not good. Do you have some sort of test case that has caused this? I'll try to reproduce it here on my own. -- Shawn.