From: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Segfault in xdl_merge is back
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 2006 03:24:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061227082440.GC23022@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612262245250.4473@woody.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
> >
> > I'm suspecting this is actually some sort of memory corruption in
> > the heap (due to a bad malloc/free) as the bug seems to rear its
> > head only based on the data we are allocating/have allocated.
>
> Can you try to reproduce it under Linux and use "valgrind" to run the
> thing that SIGSEGV's? That tends to be a pretty good way to debug bad
> allocations..
>
> So instead of bisecting it on cygwin, try to use the build that broke on
> Linux too (ie undo the 5caf9232 "fix") and when you can reproduce it under
> Linux, compiel withour -O2 and with debug information, and gdb will be a
> lot more useful, but also run it with valgrind..
Good advice. Unfortunately it may be difficult to get valgrind onto
a Linux system where I can also put that repository which is failing.
Junio suggested that I try running git-merge-file on the three
blobs that I'm segfaulting on. That's a pretty quick test.
Failing that I may have to find a way to get valgrind onto a Linux
system - but that could take a month or more. (The UNIX admins
are overworked and don't care much about Linux, and I don't have
my own Linux system there.)
I'd really like to get this segfault fixed before 1.5.0 ships. Its
a rather nasty bug and I suspect the culprit is already in 1.5.0-rc0.
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-27 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-27 4:16 Segfault in xdl_merge is back Shawn Pearce
2006-12-27 6:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-27 8:24 ` Shawn Pearce [this message]
2006-12-27 11:22 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-27 12:53 ` Alexandre Julliard
2006-12-28 16:13 ` [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-28 22:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-29 4:16 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-12-30 18:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2006-12-30 19:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-31 1:09 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-02 13:18 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-01-02 20:58 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-02 21:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-01-02 21:17 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061227082440.GC23022@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).