From: Robert Fitzsimons <robfitz@273k.net>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Fitzsimons <robfitz@273k.net>,
Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@gmail.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Rogan Dawes <discard@dawes.za.net>,
Kernel Org Admin <ftpadmin@kernel.org>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: read-for-fill and caching in gitweb (Re: kernel.org mirroring)
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:31:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061229193156.GG6558@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200612291140.46909.jnareb@gmail.com>
> > project_list summary shortlog log
> > v267 173 1.6 1141 8.8 795 5.0 919 1.9
> > 1.4.4.3 220 2.3 397 2.4 930 4.2 1113 56.9
> > 1.5.0.rc0.g4a4d 226 1.9 292 1.7 352 4.0 491 6.7
> > 1.5.0.rc0.g4a4d 60 1.0 131 0.7 195 1.2 347 3.7
> > (mod_perl)
> It is simply the case that new features cost more. Namely in earlier
> versions of gitweb Last Change time was taken from HEAD (from current
> branch), in newer we check all branches (using git-for-each-ref).
> For published public repository it migh make sense to pack also heads
> (make them packed refs).
>
> I was thinking about making this a gitweb %feature, allowing gitweb
> administrator to chose if Last Change is taken from all branches
> (as it is now), from HEAD (as it was before), or from given branch
> (for example master).
I've sent a separate email with a patch to add this feature.
("[PATCH] gitweb: New feature last_modified_ref."
<20061229185805.GF6558@localhost>).
Here are the new numbers. Notes: I've only got 3 projects in my project
list and I did a 'git gc' on them since yesterday.
project_list summary shortlog log
v267 174 1.1 286 2.1 794 3.4 921 3.2
1.4.4.3 207 1.7 383 2.0 921 5.2 1082 3.8
g04509 + patch 213 1.6 297 68.9 341 3.9 484 5.0
g04509 + patch 71 69.9 117 2.5 190 2.1 341 2.7
(mod_perl)
g04509 + patch 209 1.0 276 1.5 342 3.3 483 6.3
(HEAD)
g04509 + patch 66 70.1 117 2.6 189 3.4 341 3.8
(HEAD, mod_perl)
The v267 summary time is wrong, that version of gitweb is not
packed-refs aware.
I think I need a more consistent test setup I'm seeing some weird
deviations.
Robert
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-29 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-28 20:45 read-for-fill and caching in gitweb (Re: kernel.org mirroring) Martin Langhoff
2006-12-29 3:21 ` Robert Fitzsimons
2006-12-29 10:40 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-29 11:46 ` Martin Langhoff
2006-12-29 12:47 ` Jakub Narebski
2006-12-29 19:31 ` Robert Fitzsimons [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061229193156.GG6558@localhost \
--to=robfitz@273k.net \
--cc=discard@dawes.za.net \
--cc=ftpadmin@kernel.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.langhoff@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).