From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robert Fitzsimons Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: New feature last_modified_ref. Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:12:18 +0000 Message-ID: <20061230001218.GH6558@localhost> References: <20061229185805.GF6558@localhost> <7vlkkqms8n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Robert Fitzsimons , Jakub Narebski , Martin Langhoff , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 30 01:12:29 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0Rpj-0008Sj-ME for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 01:12:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755078AbWL3AMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:12:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755107AbWL3AMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:12:14 -0500 Received: from igraine.blacknight.ie ([81.17.252.25]:51596 "EHLO igraine.blacknight.ie" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755078AbWL3AMN (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:12:13 -0500 Received: from 213-202-190-9.bas504.dsl.esat.net ([213.202.190.9] helo=localhost) by igraine.blacknight.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H0RpO-0005MX-Qk; Sat, 30 Dec 2006 00:11:58 +0000 To: Junio C Hamano Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vlkkqms8n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-blacknight-igraine-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.012, required 7, autolearn=disabled, RCVD_IN_NERDS_IE -2.00, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 1.99) X-MailScanner-From: robfitz@273k.net Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > I somehow suspect this is solving the problem with a wrong > tradeoff. I think the main problem is that we are trying to fix possible performance problems with the latest version, just because they might cause a major problem on kernel.org. At this point I think we should get the latest version loaded and see what the real problems are. Robert