From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update git-pull.txt for clone's new default behavior Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20070101034825.GD15537@fieldses.org> References: <7vwt47bjwa.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <59142.7095.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, Shawn Pearce , Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 01 04:48:41 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H1EAA-0004Bx-8a for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 01 Jan 2007 04:48:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933246AbXAADsb (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933247AbXAADsb (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:31 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:34158 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933246AbXAADsa (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:30 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H1E9x-0007AD-CJ; Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:48:25 -0500 To: Luben Tuikov Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59142.7095.qm@web31801.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 07:29:22PM -0800, Luben Tuikov wrote: > I.e. I'd like to say "git-pull parent" or "git-pull parents" > in such and such branch, and this would pull the designated > parent(s) for the current branch. But if I'm in a different > branch (of the same repo) then the meaning of "parent" changes > accordingly. Could you explain a situation where this would be useful? A "parent<-->child" relationship, where there's one upstream branch that is always merged in, is easily handled; just replace your "git pull parent" by a "git pull", right? Am I misunderstanding the proposal? And is there any reason why your proposal conflicts with Junio's? --b.