From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Detached HEAD (experimental) Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:58:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20070106185836.GH4655@fieldses.org> References: <7vac11yirf.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87ps9xgkjo.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <87mz51gd7e.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 06 19:59:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H3Gkv-0001Rb-Sh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 19:59:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932078AbXAFS6j (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:58:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932083AbXAFS6j (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:58:39 -0500 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:55401 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932078AbXAFS6j (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Jan 2007 13:58:39 -0500 Received: from bfields by pickle.fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H3GkW-0002vh-TL; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 13:58:36 -0500 To: Carl Worth Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mz51gd7e.wl%cworth@cworth.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 04:34:45PM -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > And now I start getting confused. If git-checkout wants a branch, and > git-branch says that "origin/next" is a branch, then why won't this > work? OK, I know that something's special about origin/next, (it's a > "remote-tracking branch" and I needed a -r option to get git-branch to > list it for me), but nothing in the git-checkout documentation would > lead me to expect that "git checkout origin/next" wouldn't work. If we use the word "branches" for things that you can check out and commit to, then "remote-tracking branches" are not actually branches. Argh! What would be better terminology here? --b.