From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Higdon Subject: Re: How git affects kernel.org performance Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:18:12 -0800 Message-ID: <20070109021812.GE44262@sgi.com> References: <1168140954.2153.1.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <45A08269.4050504@zytor.com> <45A083F2.5000000@zytor.com> <20070107085526.GR24090@1wt.eu> <20070107011542.3496bc76.akpm@osdl.org> <20070108030555.GA7289@in.ibm.com> <20070108125819.GA32756@thunk.org> <45A24A65.1070706@garzik.org> <20070108170934.dafc5b81.pj@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff Garzik , tytso@mit.edu, suparna@in.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, w@1wt.eu, torvalds@osdl.org, hpa@zytor.com, git@vger.kernel.org, nigel@nigel.suspend2.net, warthog9@kernel.org, randy.dunlap@oracle.com, pavel@ucw.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, webmaster@kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org X-From: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 09 03:19:21 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcfe-linux-ext4@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H46a5-0002IA-8R for gcfe-linux-ext4@gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 03:19:17 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750939AbXAICTF (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:19:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750947AbXAICTF (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:19:05 -0500 Received: from omx2-ext.sgi.com ([192.48.171.19]:37587 "EHLO omx2.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbXAICTB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:19:01 -0500 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by omx2.sgi.com (8.12.11/8.12.9/linux-outbound_gateway-1.1) with ESMTP id l095A04R027834; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 21:10:00 -0800 Received: from classic.engr.sgi.com (classic.engr.sgi.com [150.166.2.36]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id l092I1bC78367927; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:18:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from classic.engr.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by classic.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l092IEA8045083; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:18:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from jeremy@localhost) by classic.engr.sgi.com (SGI-8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/Submit) id l092ICn0045079; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 18:18:12 -0800 (PST) To: Paul Jackson Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070108170934.dafc5b81.pj@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 05:09:34PM -0800, Paul Jackson wrote: > Jeff wrote: > > Something I just thought of: ATA and SCSI hard disks do their own > > read-ahead. > > Probably this is wishful thinking on my part, but I would have hoped > that most of the read-ahead they did was for stuff that happened to be > on the cylinder they were reading anyway. So long as their read-ahead > doesn't cause much extra or delayed disk head motion, what does it > matter? And they usually won't readahead if there is another command to process, though they can be set up to read unrequested data in spite of outstanding commands. When they are reading ahead, they'll only fetch LBAs beyond the last request until a buffer fills or the readahead gets interrupted. jeremy