From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Yann Dirson Subject: [PATCH 0/7] StGIT, remotes, and parent Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:05:19 +0100 Message-ID: <20070129230117.7102.64322.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Catalin Marinas X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 30 00:06:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBfa4-00053b-MA for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:06:33 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752628AbXA2XGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:06:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964819AbXA2XGX (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:06:23 -0500 Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr ([212.27.42.27]:35407 "EHLO smtp1-g19.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752626AbXA2XGE (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:06:04 -0500 Received: from gandelf.nowhere.earth (nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.214.146]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E719B5F2; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:06:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from gandelf.nowhere.earth (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gandelf.nowhere.earth (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E55F1F07F; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:05:20 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: StGIT/0.11 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: This new series should bring the first 5 patches into sufficiently reasonable shape, so I'm presenting them for inclusion. The last 2 ones are still there for context only. This new revision of the series brings: - Better use of stgit.config in subsequent patches, notably deported the remaining call to repo-config into stgit.config: config.sections_matching(regexp) - Caching in stgit.config. I implemented this as on-demand caching, initially because it was straightforward, but it turns out that sections_matching() naturally fits in this model, and i'm not sure how we could have implemented this in the pre-caching model. - The usual bunch of misc cleanups. Best regards, -- Yann Dirson | Debian-related: | Support Debian GNU/Linux: | Freedom, Power, Stability, Gratis http://ydirson.free.fr/ | Check