From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: blameview and file line number Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:08:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20070130140859.GC6949@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20070130140650.GB6949@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List To: Aneesh Kumar X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 30 15:09:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HBtfa-0000RO-Ub for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:09:11 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965453AbXA3OJE (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:09:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965455AbXA3OJD (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:09:03 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:1558 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S965453AbXA3OJB (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:09:01 -0500 Received: (qmail 16319 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2007 09:09:26 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 30 Jan 2007 09:09:26 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 30 Jan 2007 09:08:59 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070130140650.GB6949@coredump.intra.peff.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 09:06:50AM -0500, Jeff King wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2007 at 12:55:44PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar wrote: > > > Is it a typo or intentional ? I found the blameview output confusing. > > The original output was 0-based, so I suspect that line simply didn't > get updated when Junio changed the incremental format to be 1-based. Er, disregard this. Junio explained what's happening already. -Peff