From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MinGW port usable
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:18:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070130151803.GA25779@spearce.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0701301524360.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> wrote:
> On the git repository, using MinGW:
> Using cygwin:
>
> IOW MinGW wins hands down with an average 0.33s vs cygwin with an average
> 0.75s. (I am fairly certain that you must not trust sys times.)
Just curious, but were these tests run with mmap(), or NO_MMAP?
Clearly, for a packed repository most of the overhead should be
in getting to the pack data itself (as everything else is pure
userspace).
--
Shawn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-29 22:20 MinGW port usable Johannes Sixt
2007-01-29 22:35 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-29 23:11 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-29 23:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-29 23:48 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 7:59 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 8:07 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 10:16 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:27 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 16:31 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 8:47 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-29 22:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-29 23:08 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 10:08 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 10:14 ` Christian MICHON
2007-01-30 8:45 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 14:35 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:18 ` Shawn O. Pearce [this message]
2007-01-30 15:38 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 15:56 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 16:12 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 16:28 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-01-30 16:49 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 0:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 8:23 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 8:41 ` Andreas Ericsson
2007-01-30 10:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 17:09 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 17:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-01-30 18:09 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-01-30 20:20 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-01-30 5:53 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-01 6:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-01 10:34 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-01 21:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 8:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-02-02 8:49 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-02 8:55 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-02 8:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070130151803.GA25779@spearce.org \
--to=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.sixt@telecom.at \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).