From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: git docs on kernel.org too new? Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:20:57 -0500 Message-ID: <20070201192057.GC18608@spearce.org> References: <906f26060702011014r254ffd5frd75296c8443078ab@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Stefano Spinucci X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 01 20:21:10 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HChUa-0000EK-6E for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:21:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422947AbXBATVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:21:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422957AbXBATVE (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:21:04 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:39528 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422947AbXBATVD (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:21:03 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HChUL-0008K0-7F; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 14:20:53 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A0F620FBAE; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 14:20:58 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <906f26060702011014r254ffd5frd75296c8443078ab@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stefano Spinucci wrote: > this isn't the first time someone is confused by git docs, and I guess > why we can't have a documentation page as > http://www.python.org/doc/versions/ Indeed. Or at least only post docs which correspond to a downloadable tar file? Perhaps we could embed in at least the HTML version of the docs the output of `GIT-VERSION-GEN` ? Then users at least have a chance at knowing the docs are referring to 1.5.0-rc3 and not to 1.4.4.4? -- Shawn.