From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Blu Corater <blu@daga.cl>
Subject: Re: replacing a bad commit
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 17:53:24 -0300
Message-ID: <20070205205324.GC21890@daga.cl>
References: <20070205153949.GT14499@daga.cl> <eq7mf0$lb0$1@sea.gmane.org> <20070205195332.GW14499@daga.cl> <eq84ht$oaf$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 05 21:53:31 2007
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1HEAqA-0003Co-1C
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 21:53:30 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S933122AbXBEUx1 (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:53:27 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933383AbXBEUx0
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:53:26 -0500
Received: from pc-25-158-44-190.cm.vtr.net ([190.44.158.25]:48257 "EHLO
	daga.cl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S933122AbXBEUx0 (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Feb 2007 15:53:26 -0500
Received: from blu by daga.cl with local (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <blu@daga.cl>)
	id 1HEAq4-00066F-8c
	for git@vger.kernel.org; Mon, 05 Feb 2007 17:53:24 -0300
Mail-Followup-To: git@vger.kernel.org
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <eq84ht$oaf$1@sea.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/38787>

On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:38:47PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:

[...]
> But I agree that git-rebase(1) needs clarification. Do you volunteer? ;-)
[...]

In fact I was mentally preparing a patch when Shawn got ahead of me :)

Let me learn the list conventions on sending patches and I will send
something.

-- 
Blu.