From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add KMail in SubmittingPatches Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 14:45:07 +0100 Message-ID: <200702061445.07657.barra_cuda@katamail.com> References: <7v1wl7bv66.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200702051427.32532.barra_cuda@katamail.com> <7vveigkmpv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 06 14:39:44 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEQXm-0006nX-Ls for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:39:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752157AbXBFNj1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:39:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752156AbXBFNj1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:39:27 -0500 Received: from slim-3a.inet.it ([213.92.5.124]:55976 "EHLO slim-3a.inet.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752135AbXBFNj0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:39:26 -0500 Received: from dial-up-mi-727.lombardiacom.it ([::ffff:212.34.227.219]) by slim-3a.inet.it via I-SMTP-5.4.4-547 id ::ffff:212.34.227.219+hk8idDWpe3; Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:39:03 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 In-Reply-To: <7vveigkmpv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano: > Michael writes: > > @@ -331,3 +330,21 @@ whitespaces (fatal in patches). Running 'C-u g' to > > display the > > message in raw form before using '|' to run the pipe can work > > this problem around. [...] > This is quite interesting -- notice your own hunk header @@ ... @@ line? I see. It's this account's fault: now I know because I've tried with another account. I didn't know it had this glitch, sorry. > I do not use KMail myself, so I cannot comment on the procedure, > but from the cursory look it *should* do the right thing. Only > that it makes me a bit nervous to see your hunk header being > line wrapped. > > Doubly interesting is that somebody appears to have added two > message IDs. > > Subject: [PATCH] Documentation: add KMail in SubmittingPatches > Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2007 14:27:32 +0100 > User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 > Message-Id: <200702051427.32532.barra_cuda@katamail.com> > Message-ID: <20070205132150.123659@dial-up-mi-449.lombardiacom.it> This is my current account's fault too. So I used KMail correctly, but my mail server did something to the message. I guess I should use another account. Anyway, if some other KMail user has something to say about this issue, it will make things clearer. Bye.