From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] tar archive frontend for fast-import. Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:01:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20070208210141.GA1047@spearce.org> References: <20070208203845.GB956@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 08 22:01:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFGOt-0002fS-LB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 22:01:51 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423339AbXBHVBt (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:01:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423340AbXBHVBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:01:48 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:33988 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423339AbXBHVBs (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:01:48 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HFGOd-0002Ua-1n; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:01:35 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 41D6B20FBAE; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 16:01:41 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > > Each tar is treated as one commit, with the commit timestamp coming > > from the oldest file modification date found within the tar. > > You mean the youngest, i.e. the newest file, right? (I did not read the > code yet...) Arrggh! Yes, of course, the youngest/newest file. The code (and you) is right, the commit message is wrong. ;-) -- Shawn.