From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: how to speed up "git log"? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:35 -0500 Message-ID: <20070211230035.GD31488@spearce.org> References: <200702111252.28393.bruno@clisp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bruno Haible , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 12 00:00:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HGNga-0002Sb-Jj for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:00:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932914AbXBKXAk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932917AbXBKXAk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:40 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:51967 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932914AbXBKXAk (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:40 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGNgJ-0003So-6J; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:27 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2588F20FBAE; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:00:35 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > 1) Why so much user CPU time? > > See above. Some of the ideas Nico and I have kicked around for a pack v4 (post 1.5.0, obviously) would speed up revision traversal by bypassing some of the costly decompression overheads. > > 2) Why so much system CPU time, but only on MacOS X? > > Probably the mmap() problem. Does it go away when you use git 1.5.0-rc4? What does 1.5.0-rc4 do here that didn't happen before? Are you referring to the mmap sliding window? Because NO_MMAP might be faster on MacOS X then using mmap (thanks to its slower mmap)... but I can't say I have performance tested it either way. -- Shawn.