From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: Merge git-gui into 1.5.0 ? Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:02:04 -0500 Message-ID: <20070211230204.GE31488@spearce.org> References: <20070211084030.GE2082@spearce.org> <7vwt2oba8s.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070211224158.GA31488@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 12 00:02:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HGNi1-000378-GB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:02:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932821AbXBKXCK (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:02:10 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932915AbXBKXCK (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:02:10 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:51994 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932821AbXBKXCJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:02:09 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HGNhj-0003VD-WF; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:01:56 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1257120FBAE; Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:02:04 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > It may make patching slightly more interesting though, as some > > users new to git-gui development may generate a patch in git.git > > (using a/git-gui/git-gui.sh as the path) which then would not apply > > as-is to the master git-gui development tree. > > In this case, a "-p " option to git-am would make sense, no? Are you saying we just suddenly found a vaild use for a flag which nobody (except the original submitter) thought was useful? ;-) Yes, clearly a -p on git-am would solve the problem quite nicely. -- Shawn.