From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Parkins Subject: Re: git-cvsserver doesn't respect core.sharedrepository Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 18:21:34 +0000 Message-ID: <200702131821.37284.andyparkins@gmail.com> References: <200702131438.30291.andyparkins@gmail.com> <200702131605.29088.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 13 19:24:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HH2KU-0000Ve-Fa for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:24:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751482AbXBMSYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:24:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751483AbXBMSYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:24:35 -0500 Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com ([64.233.184.239]:3367 "EHLO wr-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751482AbXBMSYf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:24:35 -0500 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i31so194603wra for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:24:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=i/ZcnXmT0ipD6sYA0xBIuWUncyuxHmKNk/7Te4FPIwfAqwy8y4KMD3L8byLhIXuB4uY9s+OvTBWD7HRDYDI3vqNfdx7+r04Fa0roAz9lL2Jz4KTtSCvgEdodplVf428++viQHt93OptkbeqPnrLENKcXG++ebLVb/BoumaTiAKs= Received: by 10.90.75.10 with SMTP id x10mr19659174aga.1171391073666; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from grissom.internal.parkins.org.uk ( [84.201.153.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g30sm12474752ugd.2007.02.13.10.24.30; Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:24:31 -0800 (PST) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tuesday 2007, February 13, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Ummm. What I tried to say is that this is intended behaviour, not bad > behaviour. The file does not have to have write permissions for the > group. The _directory_ has to have them. It's not just write permissions. The default umask could also prevent read access by the group - the new ref needs to be readable by the group. Andy -- Dr Andrew Parkins, M Eng (Hons), AMIEE andyparkins@gmail.com