From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>,
Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>,
Alexander Litvinov <litvinov2004@gmail.com>,
Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@verizon.net>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 09:41:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070214084121.GB25617@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702131524130.3604@woody.linux-foundation.org>
> > This whole auto CRLF things seems to deal with DOS issues that I personally
> > have not encountered since looong time ago.
>
> Maybe you stopped using DOS a loong time ago ;)
Unfortunately not. (Sitting with a Windows 2000 laptop atm but saved by ssh).
>
> It's definitely an issue. Yes, all windows programs basically *understand*
> files that have just LF. But almost all of them will *write* files with
> CRLF.
So the issue with git supporting CRLF -> LF is to make interoperability between
UNIX* programs and Windows programs which is anohter domain.
My main objective is the proposal to make a conversion default when many users
do not need it. For the UNIX* compatibility thing having conversion at lowest
layer make sense.
> (Which means that I suspect I made the default for "auto_crlf" be wrong in
> my patch: I probably should not default to checking out with CRLF, but
> checking out with just LF, and only do the CRLF->LF conversion on input).
Expect that it seems a few br0ken programs yet does not support LF as
end-of-line marker - so .gitattriutes make take special care here.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-14 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-11 23:13 mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git Mark Levedahl
2007-02-11 23:34 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 0:46 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-02-12 2:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-12 11:21 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 0:14 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-12 2:37 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-12 4:24 ` Theodore Tso
2007-02-12 7:28 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 11:36 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 22:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 23:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 22:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 23:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-12 23:23 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 23:24 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-12 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-12 23:46 ` David Lang
2007-02-12 23:50 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 0:59 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 1:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 1:13 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-02-13 1:20 ` David Lang
2007-02-13 1:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 5:18 ` Jeff King
2007-02-13 0:32 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 2:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 3:21 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 6:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 3:32 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-13 10:06 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 12:16 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-13 12:37 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 19:36 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 1:42 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 21:58 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 1:18 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-13 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 19:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 20:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-13 21:08 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-02-13 23:19 ` David Lang
2007-02-13 23:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 8:41 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-02-14 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 16:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-02-14 3:47 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-14 5:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 5:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 11:10 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 14:26 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 15:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 16:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 15:56 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 16:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:28 ` Mark Levedahl
2007-02-14 18:17 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 20:24 ` Robin Rosenberg
2007-02-14 15:44 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 15:53 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-14 11:36 ` Alexander Litvinov
2007-02-14 16:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-14 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-14 16:16 ` Johannes Sixt
2007-02-14 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:05 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 17:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-02-13 18:04 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-02-13 18:11 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 18:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13 18:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070214084121.GB25617@uranus.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=litvinov2004@gmail.com \
--cc=mlevedahl@verizon.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).