From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Robin Rosenberg Subject: Re: mingw, windows, crlf/lf, and git Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:17:50 +0100 Organization: Dewire Message-ID: <200702141917.51341.robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com> References: <45CFA30C.6030202@verizon.net> <45D346B6.5020802@verizon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Mark Levedahl , Linus Torvalds , Junio C Hamano , Alexander Litvinov , Git Mailing List To: Mark Levedahl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 14 19:17:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HHOgX-0007wC-A5 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:16:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932425AbXBNSQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:16:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932426AbXBNSQu (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:16:50 -0500 Received: from [83.140.172.130] ([83.140.172.130]:18840 "EHLO dewire.com" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932425AbXBNSQt (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:16:49 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68E7803393; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:11:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from dewire.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (torino [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01124-07; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:11:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.9.0.2] (unknown [10.9.0.2]) by dewire.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505E2800199; Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:11:53 +0100 (CET) User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 In-Reply-To: <45D346B6.5020802@verizon.net> Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at dewire.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: onsdag 14 februari 2007 18:28 skrev Mark Levedahl: > As to cvsnt, my actual feeling is I'd like to kick it in the ass, it has > destroyed too many files for me over the years, binary and text, so I > don't think its strategies are very good. That is why I'm kicking these > ideas around, if I thought I knew the "right" way I would have written > it already. That may be why an excellent piece of software, TortoiseCVS, doesn't trust cvs or cvsnt to do the job. Here is how they do the binary detection (and some more): http://tortoisecvs.cvs.sourceforge.net/tortoisecvs/TortoiseCVS/src/CVSGlue/CVSStatus.cpp?revision=1.172&view=markup -- robin