From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Shawn O. Pearce" Subject: Re: [PATCH] A new merge stragety 'subtree'. Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20070217090228.GG27864@spearce.org> References: <7vfy95y2n9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070217084558.GE27864@spearce.org> <7vps89upyl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 17 10:02:38 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HILSo-0001E0-F1 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 10:02:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965074AbXBQJCe (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965077AbXBQJCe (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:34 -0500 Received: from corvette.plexpod.net ([64.38.20.226]:34348 "EHLO corvette.plexpod.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965074AbXBQJCd (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:33 -0500 Received: from cpe-74-70-48-173.nycap.res.rr.com ([74.70.48.173] helo=asimov.home.spearce.org) by corvette.plexpod.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HILSf-0001W3-Fk; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:29 -0500 Received: by asimov.home.spearce.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E266920FBAE; Sat, 17 Feb 2007 04:02:28 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vps89upyl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - corvette.plexpod.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - spearce.org X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano wrote: > "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > > > Really that isn't too different from a rename detection. > > I know, but I am just lazy. The match scoring part is very well > isolated so you or anybody can plug different code there. Is that a hint that I should code something if I think its better? ;-) I'll probably try to code up a competing version of the match code based on the fun stuff you did not quote, but likely won't get around to it for at least week. -- Shawn.