From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: [PATCH] object name: introduce ':::' notation Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:30:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20070224013015.GA9021@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <20070224011214.GA8369@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Feb 24 02:30:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HKljx-0002gf-UM for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:30:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933317AbXBXBaS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:30:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933318AbXBXBaS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:30:18 -0500 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3829 "HELO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S933317AbXBXBaR (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:30:17 -0500 Received: (qmail 20484 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2007 20:30:28 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO coredump.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 2007 20:30:28 -0500 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:30:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I said: > > > Alex Riesen and Shawn Pearce suggested ":/" instead of ":::", to > > argument? Why not just add a '--grep' or similar option to indicate that Hmm, I completely misread your patch comments in the first place, so forget my suggestion; it obviously needs to be a per-committish indicator, not a per-command flag. I think :/ is slightly easier on the eyes than :::. Plus it opens the door for :? to find the oldest such match (though I'm not sure if it would be by topology or date). Of course it's starting to look a bit like line noise...maybe we just need :-/ and :-). -Peff