From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove tab character from conflicted files list part of the merge message
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:18:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703131518.54076.andyparkins@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0703131539430.22628@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de>
On Tuesday 2007 March 13 14:42, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> And of course the next guy will have the reverse problem, because he typed
> <TAB><SPACE> instead of <SPACE>*5. What do you tell _him_ after "fixing"
> this issue? "Do as _I_ do"?
That's basically what you're telling me by saying I can't have that change.
But as it happens, no I wasn't doing this as a "do it my way" kind of thing.
As it happens I /like/ tabs in my source code. However, this isn't source
code.
Let's forget my own problem - I was only offering it as backstory. Consider a
log message with no additional comments about the conflicts. The current
output looks like this:
Conflicts:
\tfile1.c
\tfile2.c
Now, view this message on the terminal with git-log, now view it in gitk, now
view it in qgit, now view it in git-gui. All of these could be set for
different tab widths, and will hence display the log message differently.
git-merge has to pick one or the other - tabs or spaces - for me, I'd rather
pick the one that means the message displays the same regardless of what the
author of the viewer/terminal thought tabs should be set to that day. I'd
also prefer that when others view the log there is more chance that they'll
see the same as I do.
Of course, there is nothing we can do if a log message author chooses to put
tabs in - but at least if git uses spaces the choice isn't already made.
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-13 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-13 13:09 [PATCH] Remove tab character from conflicted files list part of the merge message Andy Parkins
2007-03-13 14:42 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-13 15:18 ` Andy Parkins [this message]
2007-03-13 15:44 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-03-13 16:22 ` Andy Parkins
2007-03-14 9:26 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703131518.54076.andyparkins@gmail.com \
--to=andyparkins@gmail.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).