From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] user-manual: ensure generated manual references stylesheet Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:36:39 -0400 Message-ID: <20070316153639.GH31722@fieldses.org> References: <1173045556191-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> <11730455574115-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> <1173045558959-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> <11730455591178-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> <20070316142431.GE31722@fieldses.org> <7C0AC446-57CA-480B-A14E-1E861E2FCBA7@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Robert Pluim , git@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Gernhardt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 16 16:36:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HSEU1-00042v-Rb for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 16:36:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753544AbXCPPgn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:36:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753547AbXCPPgn (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:36:43 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:58564 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753544AbXCPPgm (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:36:42 -0400 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HSETv-0006XI-V8; Fri, 16 Mar 2007 11:36:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7C0AC446-57CA-480B-A14E-1E861E2FCBA7@silverinsanity.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 11:01:47AM -0400, Brian Gernhardt wrote: > I remember running into huge issues with docbook and xmlto under > either Fink or MacPorts because it was still looking in /etc/xml/ > catalog. IIRC, the --nonet flag disables network access but not > having it does not mean that you will access the network. What > happens is that on machines with the xsl files installed, it will use > the local copy either way (via /etc/xml/catalog), but if you don't it > will go to the actual URL (which will die with --nonet). Oh, OK, thanks for pointing that out. So I agree then that --nonet doesn't make sense. > I personally don't see a reason to use --nonet for everyone. If a > particular user doesn't want xsltproc hitting the 'net then they can > use that option, but there's no reason to break the build for people > who don't care. Providing a user-configurable variable to pass > options to xsltproc is probably a good idea anyway. (XSLTFLAGS, > maybe?) Eh, it doesn't sound like there's a real need for it for --nonet. Is there some other reason to do that? --b.