From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eygene Ryabinkin Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added make options NO_GUI and WITH_P4IMPORT. Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:42:11 +0300 Message-ID: <20070321144210.GF14837@codelabs.ru> References: <20070320114525.GP96806@codelabs.ru> <20070321051406.GW96806@codelabs.ru> <20070321115004.GB14837@codelabs.ru> <4601437D.1010700@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jakub Narebski To: Paolo Bonzini X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 21 15:42:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HU21W-0001b3-Oh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:42:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752922AbXCUOmS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:42:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752923AbXCUOmS (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:42:18 -0400 Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru ([144.206.177.45]:55312 "EHLO pobox.codelabs.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752922AbXCUOmQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:42:16 -0400 Received: from codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HU211-0004Nt-A1; Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:42:15 +0300 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4601437D.1010700@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_40 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Paolo, good day. Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:38:53PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> I am happening to develop on some machines on which I have no > >> X-Windows or any GUI providers at all, so I prefer not to have the > >> Tcl/Tk dependency at all. > > > > If you don't do something, it is often interesting to state why: if you > > don't install something to prevent a dependency you don't want to have, it > > is different from saying that you do not want to have a GUI, _even if_ the > > dependency is there already. > > I read his message as "these are useless for me, so why introduce a > useless dependency?" The "effect" is to have no Tcl dependence, > but the original reason is to have no GUI. Yep, you're right. That was I meant originally. How do you feel about NO_GUI or NO_TCL names? -- Eygene