From: Christian Wiese <morfoh@opensde.org>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Git / Subversion Interoperability
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:30:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070323233036.77325e5a@athlon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703230052570.2746@beast.quantumfyre.co.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1266 bytes --]
Hello,
> > - Branches. In SVN these are in the repository wide namespace,
> > but in Git they aren't. I imagine we'd want to just enforce the
> > standard layout that the SVN people recommened:
> >
> > /trunk/ --> refs/heads/master
> > /branches/ --> refs/heads/ (minus master)
> > /tags/ --> refs/tags/
>
> That would probably be good enough for the majority of
> one-project-per-repo Subversion projects at least. Though there is
> still the issue that Subversion will actually let you create a "tag"
> simply by committing whatever you currently have in your working copy
> (including localally modified files ... yeuch).
If the proposed solution just supports "one-project-per-repo"
Subversion projects then you won't attract much projects which are
currently using subversion. I don't know many svn repos of this kind.
What you should also consider, is that a project might have splitted a
project within a repo into smaller subprojects.
I'm currently facing this issue while trying to migrate from svn to git
within my local working environment to gather experience while working
with git to be able to effectively "sell" git to the other people of
our project and provide a smooth migration path for them.
Chris
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-23 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-22 22:48 Git / Subversion Interoperability Bruno Cesar Ribas
2007-03-23 0:43 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-23 1:03 ` Julian Phillips
2007-03-23 1:24 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-23 1:36 ` Julian Phillips
2007-03-23 10:34 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-03-23 15:21 ` Bruno Cesar Ribas
2007-03-23 15:48 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-03-23 18:13 ` Julian Phillips
2007-03-23 19:34 ` Bruno Cesar Ribas
2007-03-23 22:05 ` David Lang
2007-03-23 22:11 ` Daniel Barkalow
2007-03-24 6:41 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-24 18:55 ` Karl Hasselström
2007-03-24 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-24 20:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-26 3:06 ` Sam Vilain
2007-03-23 21:30 ` Christian Wiese [this message]
2007-03-23 22:00 ` Steven Grimm
2007-03-24 6:56 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-26 3:04 ` Sam Vilain
2007-03-23 14:21 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-24 6:45 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-24 20:38 ` Eric Wong
2007-03-24 20:31 ` Eric Wong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070323233036.77325e5a@athlon \
--to=morfoh@opensde.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).