git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update-hook: remove all functionality that should be in hooks/post-receive
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:44:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703241244.23151.andyparkins@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vodmikjol.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Saturday 2007, March 24, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> But the recent updates to the mail-hook are backward compatible
> only in the sense that as long as the user configures it, the
> new script can mimic old version's behaviour (in other words, it
> was not backward compatible at all).  I think forcing updates to
> the hooks automatically is worse.  I'd rather keep hooks private
> to repository owner's concern.

But the user is still perfectly fine to /copy/ the script into 
individual repositories; but for those who don't care and just 
want "the latest and greatest" from whatever git supplies a link to the 
sample hook seems like a good solution.  I'm certainly not suggesting 
updating the ones in people's repositories automatically; what I'm 
suggesting is this:

ln -s \
  /usr/doc/git/contrib/post-receive-email
  /var/lib/git/project.git/hooks/post-receive

Or perhaps have the template post-receive hook simply contain

 . /usr/doc/git/contrib/post-receive-email

With the above in place when a user upgrades git with their package 
manager, and they have enabled the default hook script (which simply 
calls the one stored in a known location), they get the upgrade without 
having to think.

> While I think it would be great to have a central clearinghouse
> for people to share and enjoy useful hook collections for
> various workflows and use cases, I do not necessarily think

I agree - filling the place with every hook script that turns up is 
obviously not sensible.  However, this is not a hook collection; nor 
are their "people", there is just me.  Shawn asked if I'd convert the 
existing update hook to post-receive, that's what I did.  Show me these 
other "hook collections" that are desparately trying to get this 
apparently coveted position...

> inside git.git project itself is the best place to do so.

Erm, where is the right place then?

I think that git should supply in git.git a default set that do 
typically wanted things (things like the perfect patch pre-commit hook, 
the no-unannotated-tags update hook, and of course the email sending 
hook) that can be enabled with a simple chmod a+x hooks/somescript.  
All I was doing was supplying a script to fill the post-receive slot.

That all sounds a lot more toys-out-of-pram than I intend; in the end, 
I'm only trying to fix the bugs that are in old update-hook.



Andy
-- 
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com

  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-24 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-23 10:21 [PATCH] update-hook: remove all functionality that should be in hooks/post-receive Andy Parkins
2007-03-24  1:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-24  3:23   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-03-24  3:28   ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-24  8:14   ` Andy Parkins
2007-03-24 10:26     ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-24 10:41       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-24 12:44         ` Andy Parkins [this message]
2007-03-24 14:21         ` Theodore Tso
2007-03-24 14:43 ` Francis Moreau
2007-03-24 15:48   ` Andy Parkins
2007-03-24 18:15     ` Francis Moreau
2007-03-25  9:11       ` Andy Parkins
2007-03-25  9:25         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-03-25 14:04         ` Francis Moreau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200703241244.23151.andyparkins@gmail.com \
    --to=andyparkins@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).