From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eygene Ryabinkin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Consistently use user-defined UI font everywhere in GUI tools. Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:16:10 +0400 Message-ID: <20070326101610.GX14837@codelabs.ru> References: <20070326073715.GE44578@codelabs.ru> <7vr6rcxv5x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Mar 26 12:16:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HVmFR-0002Np-BB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 12:16:21 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751404AbXCZKQR (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:16:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753616AbXCZKQR (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:16:17 -0400 Received: from pobox.codelabs.ru ([144.206.177.45]:49999 "EHLO pobox.codelabs.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751404AbXCZKQQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:16:16 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender:X-Spam-Status:Subject; b=c1+XBHlbxqd6egFxpHXDeGjfWxrabarmpjBZ2c+KiwYfTy02hTJUetNz/q6/+ftnrgXHhFrQbHnJFl6WSN6RbvfA/yEu54MSjJ92EOrWOvTfOesXoTJW2k9qJdgS0MZbZnBHyfByem0LujtPGa+aAAstwY1oW/y4asZQYWtSjsk=; Received: from codelabs.ru (pobox.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by pobox.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1HVmFL-000Bow-1V; Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:16:15 +0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7vr6rcxv5x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_20 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio, Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 01:31:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I think this is sane in general, but please > > (1) do not make a combined patch that covers gitk and git-gui > at the same time; I assume this does not the general rule, but it is just a consequence of a gitk and git-gui being maintained by the different programmers? I've always thought that the logically related changes should go into the same commit. > (2) address gitk patches to Paul Mackerras , > with cc: the list; > > (3) address git-gui patches to Shawn Pearce > with cc: the list. OK, will do. Probably the RTFM question: can I redo my patches to split them up to the different pieces for the gitk and git-gui in some automated way? Or I will need to do it manually? Thanks! -- Eygene