From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Martin Koegler <mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Add treediff
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 02:15:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703270315.54901.jnareb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070326210548.GD1128@auto.tuwien.ac.at>
Martin Koegler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 06:12:27PM +0100, Jakub Narebski wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007, Martin Koegler wrote:
>>> +sub git_treediff {
>>> + my $format = shift || 'html';
>>> + my $from = $file_parent || "";
>>> + my $to = $file_name || "";
>>
>> I'd use $file_name || ''; here, and of course
>>
>> + my $from = $file_parent || $file_name || '';
>>
>> The unwritten rule is that we use 'fp' parameter (thet $file_parent
>> variable is set) only
>
> How do I specifiy the root tree (=tree in commit) with hpb/fp, as fp
> can not be empty, but only undefined?
As I said in previous message, we can simply relax check for 'f' and 'fp'
parameters, by changing
!validate_pathname($file_name)
to
!defined validate_pathname($file_name)
Still, there are some places where we assume that 'f' and 'fp' cannot be
empty, like in above proposal. It would be:
+ my $from = (defined $file_parent ? $file_parent : $file_name) || '';
Again, I don't want to loose the assumption that we generate 'fp' _only_
if it is different from 'f'. Otherwise old links would cease working,
which breaks backwards-compatibility, and is not cool. "Cool UR_is don't
change."
>>> +
>>> + if (!defined $hash) {
>>> + if (!defined $hash_base) {
>>> + die_error('','tree parameter missing');
>>
>> This conflicts with the coding style used elsewhere in the gitweb
[...]
>> Examples:
>> die_error(undef, "Couldn't find base commit");
[...]
> I didn't know this. I'll change this.
What's strange in other place you used die_error accoring to coding
guidelines.
>>> +
>>> + } elsif ($format eq 'plain') {
>>> + my $filename = basename($project) . "-diff.patch";
>>> +
>>
>> In "commitdiff_plain" view we use
>>
>> my $filename = basename($project) . "-$hash.patch";
>>
>> Perhaps we should use the same: "-diff.patch" does not make much sense.
>> Is it a typo?
>
> No. What unique name do you propose? It needs to include $hash and $hase_parent.
> In this case, $hash could be $hash_base:$file_name, I'm not sure, how to escape
> $file_name.
For "commitdiff" case sole $hash is also not unique. But if not -hash,
then perhaps -treediff instead of simply -diff?
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-03-27 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-25 20:34 [PATCH] gitweb: show no difference message Martin Koegler
2007-03-25 20:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: Support comparing blobs with different names Martin Koegler
2007-03-25 20:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: link base commit (hpb) to blobdiff output Martin Koegler
2007-03-25 20:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: support filename prefix in git_patchset_body Martin Koegler
2007-03-25 20:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: support filename prefix in git_difftree_body Martin Koegler
2007-03-25 20:34 ` [PATCH] gitweb: Add treediff Martin Koegler
2007-03-26 17:12 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 21:05 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-27 1:15 ` Jakub Narebski [this message]
2007-03-26 17:12 ` [PATCH] gitweb: support filename prefix in git_patchset_body Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 20:55 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-27 1:07 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 17:12 ` [PATCH] gitweb: Support comparing blobs (files) with different names Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 20:41 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-27 0:56 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-27 19:56 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-27 23:58 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-28 21:03 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-30 8:48 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-30 23:55 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-03-31 9:18 ` Martin Koegler
2007-03-31 16:16 ` Jakub Narebski
[not found] ` <7vmz1t6oe2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2007-04-03 14:57 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-04-04 21:27 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-04-05 10:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2007-03-31 14:52 ` [PATCH] gitweb: Fix bug in "blobdiff" view for split (e.g. file to symlink) patches Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 17:11 ` [PATCH] gitweb: show no difference message Jakub Narebski
2007-03-26 21:01 ` Jakub Narebski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703270315.54901.jnareb@gmail.com \
--to=jnareb@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkoegler@auto.tuwien.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).