From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff King Subject: Re: Listing of branch creation time? Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:01:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20070328000149.GA12808@coredump.intra.peff.net> References: <17929.37382.984339.742025@lisa.zopyra.com> <20070327233552.GA7186@coredump.intra.peff.net> <17929.45060.6228.797279@lisa.zopyra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Bill Lear X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 28 02:02:00 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HWLbv-0006uv-3b for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2007 02:01:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752784AbXC1ABw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:01:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752810AbXC1ABw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:01:52 -0400 Received: from 66-23-211-5.clients.speedfactory.net ([66.23.211.5]:3208 "EHLO peff.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752784AbXC1ABw (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:01:52 -0400 Received: (qmail 6638 invoked from network); 28 Mar 2007 00:02:22 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (10.0.0.2) by peff.net with (DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 28 Mar 2007 00:02:22 -0000 Received: by coredump.intra.peff.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 27 Mar 2007 20:01:49 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17929.45060.6228.797279@lisa.zopyra.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:00:04PM -0600, Bill Lear wrote: > Ok, thank you. I will try this out and keep this in mind as I test > out the patch Johannes posted. This is, btw, completely different than what Johannes posted. His patch shows you the date of the _tip_ of each of the branches. My script shows the _oldest_ reflog for the branch. So it depends on whether you want them in order of "last worked on" or "created" (you said "created", but I wonder if "last worked on" is actually more useful). -Peff