From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Riesen Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] merge-recursive: handle D/F conflict case more carefully. Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:58:09 +0200 Message-ID: <20070409185809.GA13212@steel.home> References: <7v6488ckk0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Reply-To: Alex Riesen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Barkalow , Johannes Schindelin To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 10 01:00:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Haz4C-00016w-DH for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:58:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932255AbXDIS6N (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:58:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932224AbXDIS6M (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:58:12 -0400 Received: from mo-p07-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.190]:25911 "EHLO mo-p07-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932255AbXDIS6L (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Apr 2007 14:58:11 -0400 Received: from tigra.home (Fc9f2.f.strato-dslnet.de [195.4.201.242]) by post.webmailer.de (klopstock mo57) (RZmta 5.5) with ESMTP id I0739dj39HW2m9 ; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:58:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from steel.home (steel.home [192.168.1.2]) by tigra.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD4277B6; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:58:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by steel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BCC9D150; Mon, 9 Apr 2007 20:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7v6488ckk0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-RZG-AUTH: z4gQVF2k5XWuW3CcuQaFzAcjYko= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo07 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano, Sat, Apr 07, 2007 16:42:55 +0200: > + if (unlink(path)) { > + if (errno == EISDIR) { > + /* something else exists */ > + error(msg, path, ": perhaps a D/F conflict?"); isn't this one an F/D conflict?